Prof. Dr. Felix Schönbrodt
This is a post-publication peer review (HIBAR: “Had I Been A Reviewer”) of the following paper: Levi, M., Li, K., & Zhang, F. (2010). Deal or no deal: Hormones and the mergers and acquisitions game. Management Science 56, 1462 -1483. Continue Reading …
I want to present a re-analysis of the raw data from two studies that investigated whether physical cleanliness reduces the severity of moral judgments – from the original study (n = 40; Schnall, Benton, & Harvey, 2008), and from a Continue Reading …
These days psychology really is exciting, and I do not mean the Förster case … In May 2014 a special issue full of replication attempts has been released – all open access, all raw data released! This is great work, Continue Reading …
Exzellente Hintergrundinformation gibt es auch im Blog von Markus Dahlem, z.B.: [1], [2], oder [3]. Facebook-Gruppe: https://www.facebook.com/akademischeJuniorposition Folgende Abbildung sagt eigentlich alles: (R.Kreckel, Habilitation vs. Tenure Track, Forschung und Lehre 01/2012, p.12) Wenn ihr das unterstützt, dann unterschreibt online (kann Continue Reading …
In a recent post on the DataColada blog, Uri Simonsohn wrote about “We cannot afford to study effect size in the lab“. The central message is: If we want accurate effect size (ES) estimates, we need large sample sizes (he Continue Reading …
One critique frequently heard about Bayesian statistics is the subjectivity of the assumed prior distribution. If one is cherry-picking a prior, of course the posterior can be tweaked, especially when only few data points are at hand. For example, see Continue Reading …
Maybe you have encountered this situation: you run a large-scale study over the internet, and out of curiosity, you frequently the correlation between two variables. My experience with this practice is usually frustrating, as in small sample sizes (and we Continue Reading …
Sanjay Srivastava blogged some interesting thoughts about the process of post-publication peer review (PPPR), reflecting about his own comment on a PLOS ONE publication. I agree that open peer commentaries after publication are one important part of the future of Continue Reading …